Ecological plasticity and stability of soybean varieties under climate change in Ukraine
Keywords:
adaptability, correlation, determination, homeostaticity, plasticity, stability, variance of stability, yieldAbstract
Due to the climate change, constant increase in air and soil temperatures, moisture deficiency, agricultural production requires highly adaptive varieties that would provide sufficient yields even under adverse environmental conditions. Our breeding work is aimed at creating varieties of this type. The paper presents the results of the long-term research on assessment of soybean varieties by their adaptability under different soil and climatic conditions by the yield, duration of the growing season and reproductive periods. The stability and plasticity of the researched varieties was determined using the Ebergard and Russell method. According to the research results, Artemida, Hoverla and Amethyst varieties were classified as highly plastic (bi>1) by the yield and they provided the yields of 1.95, 2.2 and 2.1 t/ha. In terms of duration of the growing season (BBCH-10-99), Amethyst, Hoverla, Artemida and Vezha provided high adaptability. These varieties were characterized by the conservative reaction to the change in hydrothermal and soil conditions ensuring stable indicators by the duration of the growing season (BBCH-10-99), coefficient of pasticity (bi) was under 1. The longest flowering-maturation period (BBCH-60-99) was observed in the following varieties: Amethyst – 69.1, Hoverla – 69.0, and Artemida – 69.1 days. The flowering-maturation period (BBCH-60-99) was under one. By the duration of the flowering-maturation period (BBCH-60-99), Amethyst, Hoverla, and Artemida varieties had the highest values of homeostaticity (Hom1 and Hom2), in particular, they were 32.8, 3.64 in Artemida, 30.2, 3.76 in Amethyst, 27.15 and 3.02 in Hoverla varieties.
References
Babych, A. O. et al. (2011). Selection, production, trade and use of soybean in the world. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka.
Batista, R.O. et al. (2015). Adaptability and stability of soybean genotypes in off-season cultivation. Genetics and Molecular Research. 14 (3), 9633-9645.
Beil, G. M. and Atkins, R. E. (1965). Inheritance of guantitative characters in grain sorghum. lova State Journal, 39, 3.
Belyavskaya, L. et al. (2022) Soybean growing under inoculation by Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains in the Forest-steppe and Steppe zones of Ukraine. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture. 109 (3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2022.109.026
Berset, E. et al. (2013). Selektion der Soja und deren Symbiosepartner auf Kühletoleranz und Effizienz der biologischen Stickstoff-Fixierung. Bonn, März 5-8. 13, 122-125.
Biliavska, L.H. (2010). Adaptability of soybean varieties of Poltava breeding under climate change. Scientific and Technical Bulletin. Institute of Oilseeds NAAS. 15, 33-38.
Biliavska, L. et al. (2021). Adaptability and breeding value of soybean varieties of Poltava breeding. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 27(2), 312–322.
Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop. Sci. 6 (1), 36−37. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
Griffing, B. (1950). Analysis of guatitative gene-acrion by constant parent regression and related technigues. Genetics, 35, 303–321.
Honcharuk, I. et al. (2022). Peculiarities of reproduction of Pinus Nigra arn. in Ukraine. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series II: Forestry, Wood Industry, Agricultural Food Engineering. 15 (1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.fwiafe.2022.15.64.1.3
Kaletnik, G. and Lutkovska, S. (2020). Innovative Environmental Strategy for Sustainable Development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n2p89
Kovbasa, V. et al. (2021). Functions derivation of stresses in the soil and resistance forces to the motion of a plough share for cavity creation. UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series D: Mechanical Engineering, 83(3), 305–318.
Lee, Ch. et al. (2014). Soybean Variety Selection. Agriculture and Natural Resources Publications. 3 (133), 1-6.
Mazur, O. et al. (2022). Garden pea yield and its quality indicators depending on the technological methods of growing in conditions of Vinnytsia region. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica. 25(3), 226-241. https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2022.25.03.226-241
Mazur, V.A. et al. (2019). Influence of the assimilation apparatus and productivity of white lupine plants. Agronomy Research, 17(1), 206–219.
Mazur, V. et al. (2021a). Agroecological stability of cultivars of sparsely distributed legumes in the context of climate change. Scientific Horizons, 24 (1), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor.24(1).2021.54-60
Mazur, V. et al. (2021b). Ecological suitability peas (Pisum Sativum) varieties to climate change in Ukraine. Agraarteadus, 32(2), 276-283. https://doi.org/10.15159/jas.21.26
Palamarchuk, V. and Telekalo, N. (2018). The effect of seed size and seeding depth on the components of maize yield structure. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 24(5), 785–792.
Paziuk, V. et al. (2021). Substantiation of the energy efficient schedules of drying grain seeds. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov. Series II: Forestry, Wood Industry, Agricultural Food Engineering, 14 (2), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.fwiafe.2021.14.63.2.13
Peltonen-Sainio, P. et al. (2009). Are there indications of climate change induced increases in variability of major field crops in the northernmost European conditions? Agricultural and Food Science, 18 (3–4, 206–222. https://doi.org/10.2137/145960609790059424
Poberezhets, Ju. et al. (2021). Effect of probiotic supplement on nutrient digestibility and production traits on broiler chicken. Agraarteadus, 32 (2), 296-302. https://doi.org/10.15159/jas.21.28
Riabukha, S.S. and Kobyzieva, L.N. (2010). Soybean breeding and seed production. In Kyrychenko, V.V. (ed.) Special selection and seed production of field crops. Kharkiv: Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS (pp. 336-378).
Roux Steffen and Wehling Peter. (2012). Beitrage der Pflanzenzuchtung zum Klimaschutz und zur Anpassung an den Klimawandel. Journal of Cultivated Plants. 64 (8), 286-294. https://doi.org/10.5073/JfK.2012.08.02
Schori, A. et al. (2003). Soybean: selection, agronomie et production en Suisse. Revue suisse d'Agriculture, 35(2), 69-76.
Silva, K.B. et al. (2017). Adaptability and stability of soybean cultivars for grain yield and seed quality. Genetics and Molecular Research. 16 (2), 1-15.
Tai, G.C.C. (1971). Genotypic stability analysis and its applikcation to potato regional trials. Crop. Sci. 11(2), 184-185. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100020006x
Volkodav, V.V. (2001). Methods of the state varietal testing of crops. Kyiv: Alefa.
Vollmann, J. et al. (2005). Anpassung der Sojabohne an besondere Qualitätsanforderungen. Tagung 2005 der Vereinigung der Pflanzenzüchter und Saatgutkaufleute Österreichs HBLFA Raumberg - Gumpenstein, 22. – 24. 47-51.
Wolf, V.G. et al. (1980). Methodical recommendations on the application of mathematical methods for the analysis of experimental data on the study of combinatorial ability. Kharkiv: HSSU.
Zhou, J. et al. (2022). Improve Soybean Variety Selection Accuracy Using UAV-Based High-Throughput Phenotyping Technology. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12, 1-14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Oleksandr Mazur, Ihor Kupchuk, Liudmyla Biliavska, Yurii Biliavskyi, Oksana Voloshyna, Olekna Mazur, Serhii Razanov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
