Wing morphometry of Slovak lines of Apis mellifera carnica honeybee population

Robert Chlebo, Jozef Čápek

Abstract


Received: 2015-11-02   |   Accepted: 2015-11-10   |   Available online: 2016-05-30

dx.doi.org/10.15414/afz.2016.19.02.41-44

 

Samples of honeybee workers and drones forewings from 16 hives belonging to various lines of Slovak Carniolan bee kept by queen breeders in Slovakia were taken in year 2013 to perform wing morphometry measurements. The Dawino, complex wing morphometry method, has been applied for workers samples and measurements of Cubital index for drones samples.  Worker bees samples showed similarity to Carniolan bee standard from 50 to 84% in 15 cases, on sample was out of standard. Cubital index of drones samples comply with a carnica bee standard in 14 cases, 2 samples were out of the range. The future of use wing morphometry for detection of hybridization in A. m. carnica populations is discussed. 

Keywords: Apis mellifera carnica, workers, drones, wing morphometry, cubital index, Dawino

References

BOOKSTEIN, F. L. (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data. Geometry and biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

BOUGA, M. et al. (2011) A review of methods for discrimination of honey bee populations as applied to European beekeeping. Journal of apicultural research, vol. 50, no.1, pp. 51-84. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.50.1.06

ČERMÁK, K. and KASPAR, R. (2003) Morphometrical analysis and taxonometrical classification of honey bees by wing characters. [Online]. Retrieved September 2015 from doi:http://beedol.cz/dawino/DAWINO_prosp_EN.pdf

DE LA RÚA, P. et al. (2009). Biodiversity, conseravation and current threats to European honey bees. Apidologie, vol.40, no.3, pp. 263-284. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido/2009027

DUPRAW, E. J. (1965) Non-Linnean taxonomy and the systematics of honey bees. Systematic Zoology, vol. 14, no.1, pp. 1-24. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2411899

FERT, G. (1997). Breeding Queens: Production of Package Bees: Introduction to Instrumental Insemination. Argentan: OPIDA. 104 p.

GARNERY, L. et al. (2004) Genetic diversity of European honeybees. First European Conference of Apidology, Udine 19-23 September, pp. 35.

KOPERNICKY, M. and CHLEBO, R. (2004) Carniolan bees. In KADLEČÍK, O. et al. Endangered breeds of animals in Slovakia. Nitra: SPU, pp. 79-85 (in Slovak).

MEIXNER, M. D. et al. (2013) Standard methods for characterising subspecies and ecotypes of Apis mellifera. Journal of Apicultural Research, vol. 52, no.4, pp. 1-28. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.05

RUTTNER, F. (1988) Biogeography and taxonomy of honeybees, 1st ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72649-1

SHEPPARD, W.S. et al. (2003) Apis mellifera pomonella, a new honey bee subspecies from Central Asia. Apidologie, vol. 34, no.4, pp. 367-375. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:2003037


Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica

© Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources