The prophylaxis of puerperal infections of cows’ genitals by Lactobacillus SPP

Danka Šťastná, Pavel Šťastný

Abstract


Article Details: Received: 2021-05-31 | Accepted: 2021-06-01 | Available online: 2021-09-30

https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2021.24.03.250-255

Many bacterial species are currently known as etiologic agents of dairy cattle metritis. Antimicrobials for endometritis treatment are infused into the uterus, and these therapies are aimed to achieve high concentrations of antibiotics in the site of infection. The aim of this work was to verify the possibility of using a non-antibiotic active substance to prevent the emergence of postpartum infections in cows. The study was realised in 12 herds of Holstein, Simental and Pinzgau cattle (4,563 animals), where the incidence of postpartum reproductive disorders was higher than 20%. After parturition, animals (4,563) were divided into four groups: (I)  1,967  primipara cows treated, (II) 2,596 pluripara cows treated, (III) 638 primipara cows untreated and (IV) 667 pluripara cows untreated. Animals were treated 24 hours after parturition with 100 ml Lactobacillus spp. (LBC), lyophilised preparation (1 ml contained 1.0 ×109 microorganisms). Lyophilisate was diluted just before the application with a sterile solvent with pH 4.4–4.7. The most prevalent pathogens were E. coli (74.7%) and Trueperella pyogenes (17.3%). E. coli caused up to 88.2% of genital inflammation – mostly endometritis. The positive effect of the preventive application of preparation based on LBC significantly eliminated the occurrence of bacterial microflora after the parturition on the 14th and 20th day of the puerperium, respectively. The preventive application was manifested to a demonstrable extent also in the subsequent reproductive parameters of cows. The preparation appeared to be more effective in primipara, especially concerning the incidence of inflammatory conditions of the genitals (P <0.01).

Keywords: cows, puerperium, prevention, Lactobacillus spp

References

Azawi, O. I. (2008). Postpartum uterine infection in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science, 105(3–4), 187–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.01.010

Bicalho, M.L.S. et al. (2012). Association between virulence factors of Escherichia coli, Fusobacterium necrophorum, and Arcanobacterium pyogenes and uterine diseases of dairy cows. Veterinary Microbiology, 157(1–2), 125–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.11.034

Bondurant, R. H. (1999). Inflammation in the bovine female reproductive tract. Journal of animal science, 77(2), 101–110. Bruce, A. W. & Reid, G. (1988). Intravaginal instillation of lactobacilli for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 34(3), 339–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/m88-062

Deng, Q. et al. (2015). Intravaginally administered lactic acid bacteria expedited uterine involution and modulated hormonal profiles of transition dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(9), 6018–6028. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8559

Dohmen, M. J. W. et al. (1995). The relationship between bacteriological and clinical findings in cows with subacute/ chronic endometritis. Theriogenology, 43(8), 1379–1388. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(95)00123-p

Dohmen, M. J. W. et al. (2000). Relationship between intrauterine bacterial contamination, endotoxin levels and the development of endometritis in postpartum cows with dystocia or retained placenta. Theriogenology, 54(7), 1019–1032. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(00)00410-6

Földi, J. et al. (2006). Bacterial complications of postpartum uterine involution in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science, 96(3–4), 265–281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.006

Genís, S. et al. (2018). Pre-calving Intravaginal Administration of Lactic Acid Bacteria Reduces Metritis Prevalence and Regulates Blood Neutrophil Gene Expression After Calving in Dairy Cattle. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00135

Corsetti, A. et al. (2005). Lactobacillus rossii sp. nov., isolated from wheat sourdough. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 55(1), 35–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63075-0

Hussain, A. M., Daniel, R. C. W., & O’Boyle, D. (1990). Postpartum uterine flora following normal and abnormal puerperium in cows. Theriogenology, 34(2), 291–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(90)90522-u

Hussain, A. M., & Daniel, R. C. W. (1992). Phagocytosis by uterine fluid and blood neutrophils and hematological changes in postpartum cows following normal and abnormal parturition. Theriogenology, 37(6), 1253–1267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(92)90181-p

Kummer, V. et al. (1997). Stimulation of cell defense mechanism of bovine endometrium by temporal colonization with selected strains of lactobacilli. Veterinarni medicina, 42(8), 217–224.

LeBlanc, S. et al. (2001): The incidence and impact of clinical endometritis in dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci., (79), 187.

LeBlanc, S. J. (2008). Postpartum uterine disease and dairy herd reproductive performance: A review. The Veterinary Journal, 176(1), 102–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.019

LeBlanc, S. J., Osawa, T., & Dubuc, J. (2011). Reproductive tract defense and disease in postpartum dairy cows. Theriogenology, 76(9), 1610–1618. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.017

LeBlanc, S. J. (2014). Reproductive tract inflammatory disease in postpartum dairy cows. Animal, 8, 54–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731114000524

Lewis, G. S. (2003). Role of ovarian progesterone and potential role of prostaglandin F2α and prostaglandin E2 in modulating the uterine response to infectious bacteria in postpartum ewes. Journal of Animal Science, 81(1), 285–293. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.811285x

Machado, V. S. et al. (2012). Investigation of postpartum dairy cows’ uterine microbial diversity using metagenomic pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Veterinary Microbiology, 159(3–4), 460–469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.04.033

McDougall, S. et al. (2013). Clinical trial of treatment programs for purulent vaginal discharge in lactating dairy cattle in New Zealand. Theriogenology, 79(8), 1139–1145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.02.002

Miller, A. N. A. et al. (2007). The effects of Arcanobacterium pyogenes on endometrial function in vitro, and on uterine and ovarian function in vivo. Theriogenology, 68(7), 972–980. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.07.013

Noakes, D., Wallace, L., & Smith, G. (1991). Bacterial flora of the uterus of cows after calving on two hygienically contrasting farms. Veterinary Record, 128(19), 440–442. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.128.19.440

Roberts, SJ (1971). Veterinary Obstetrics and Genital Diseases. 2nd ed., Ann Arbor, Michigan : Edwards Brothers, Inc.; 317–336. Saxelin, M. (1997). Lactobacillus GG – a human probiotic strain with thorough clinical documentation. Food Reviews International, 13(2), 293–313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129709541107

Sens, A. & Heuwieser, W. (2013). Presence of Escherichia coli, Trueperella pyogenes, α-hemolytic streptococci, and coagulase-negative staphylococci and prevalence of subclinical endometritis. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(10), 6347–6354. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6646

Sheldon, I. et al. (2002). Influence of uterine bacterial contamination after parturition on ovarian dominant follicle selection and follicle growth and function in cattle. Reproduction, 837–845. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1230837 

Sheldon, I. M. (2004). The postpartum uterus. Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice, 20(3), 569–591.

Sheldon, I. M. et al. (2010). Specific Strains of Escherichia coli Are Pathogenic for the Endometrium of Cattle and Cause Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Cattle and Mice. PLoS ONE, 5(2), e9192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009192

Stevenson, JS (1997): Clinical reproductive physiology of the cow. In: Youngquist, R.S. (Ed.), Current Therapy of Large Animal Theriogenology. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA, pp. 257–267. Postpartum uterine infection in cattle. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/5572206_Postpartum_uterine_infection_in_cattle

Šťastná, D., Šťastný, P., & Kúbek, A. (2007). Lactobacillus spp. in prevention of puerperal inflammation of cows. Reproduction in domestic animals. 42, (2), 110–111.

Westermann, S. et al. (2010). A clinical approach to determine false positive findings of clinical endometritis by vaginoscopy by the use of uterine bacteriology and cytology in dairy cows. Theriogenology, 74(7), 1248–1255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.05.028

Williams, E. J. et al. (2007). The relationship between uterine pathogen growth density and ovarian function in the postpartum dairy cow. Theriogenology, 68(4), 549–559. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.056

Williams, E. J. et al. (2005). Clinical evaluation of postpartum vaginal mucus reflects uterine bacterial infection and the immune response in cattle. Theriogenology, 63(1), 102–117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.03.017

Zerbe, H. et al. (2002). Lochial secretions of Escherichia colior Arcanobacterium pyogenes – infected bovine uteri modulate the phenotype and the functional capacity of neutrophilic granulocytes. Theriogenology, 57(3), 1161–1177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00713-0

Zerbe, H. et al. (2000). Altered functional and immunophenotypical properties of neutrophilic granulocytes in postpartum cows associated with fatty liver. Theriogenology, 54(5), 771–786. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(00)00389-7

 


Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica

© Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources